Brittleness – Concept Explained

Certainly! In dentistry, the term “brittle” refers to a material that is hard but tends to break or shatter easily when it is subjected to pressure or force.

To help you understand this, let’s think about some examples from the kitchen. Have you ever seen a glass cup? Glass is a good example of a brittle material. If you accidentally drop a glass cup on the floor, it often breaks into small pieces. That’s because glass is not very flexible and can’t absorb or distribute the force of the impact, so it breaks apart.

Another example is a cookie. Imagine you have a very thin and crispy cookie. If you try to bend or twist it, it will probably snap or break into pieces. That’s because the cookie is brittle.

In dentistry, there are materials used for dental crowns or dental bridges that can be brittle. These materials need to be strong to withstand the biting and chewing forces in your mouth. However, if they become too brittle, they may break or chip if you bite down on something hard, like an apple pit or ice cube.

So, brittle in dentistry means that a material is hard but can break easily when pressure or force is applied. It’s like the glass cup that shatters when it falls or the crispy cookie that breaks when you try to bend it. In dentistry, it’s important to choose materials that have a balance of strength and flexibility to prevent them from becoming too brittle and prone to breaking.

Ductility – Concept Explained

Ductility in dentistry refers to the ability of a material to be stretched or pulled into a long, thin wire without breaking. It’s like how easily you can stretch and bend a piece of chewing gum.

Imagine you have a piece of chewing gum. When you first take it out of the wrapper, it’s soft and pliable. You can easily stretch it and pull it into a long, thin string. That’s because chewing gum is a ductile material.

In dentistry, there are materials like orthodontic wires or certain dental alloys that need to be ductile. For example, when you get braces, the orthodontist uses wires that can be bent and shaped to fit around your teeth. These wires need to be ductile so that they can be easily adjusted and guided into the right position to straighten your teeth.

Another example is dental fillings. When a dentist fills a cavity in your tooth, they use a material that can be shaped and molded to fit the space. This material needs to be ductile so that it can be easily manipulated and formed to restore the shape and function of your tooth.

So, ductility in dentistry means that a material can be stretched or pulled into a long, thin wire without breaking. It’s like stretching and bending chewing gum without it snapping. Ductile materials are important in dentistry because they allow dentists to shape and mold materials to fit your teeth and provide the necessary treatment.

Resiliency – Concept Explained

Resiliency in dentistry is like the ability of a material to bounce back or spring back to its original shape after it has been compressed or deformed.

Let’s imagine you have a rubber ball. When you squeeze it with your hand, it gets squished, right? But when you let go, it quickly bounces back to its original round shape. That’s because the rubber ball is resilient.

In dentistry, materials like dental impressions or mouthguards need to be resilient. For example, when the dentist takes an impression of your teeth, they use a special material that can be compressed to capture the shape of your teeth. But after they remove the impression from your mouth, it should quickly regain its original shape, so the dentist can make an accurate model of your teeth.

Another example is a mouthguard. If you play sports, you might wear a mouthguard to protect your teeth. A good mouthguard is made of a resilient material that can absorb the impact of a hit or fall and then bounce back to its original shape, providing cushioning and protection for your teeth.

So, resiliency in dentistry means that a material can be squished or deformed but then quickly goes back to its original shape. It’s like the rubber ball bouncing back after you squeeze it. It’s important for dental materials to be resilient so they can perform their job effectively and provide the necessary protection or support.

Elastic Limit – Concept Explained

Sure! Let’s imagine you have a spring. When you push or pull on it, it stretches or compresses, right? The elastic limit in dentistry is like the maximum amount that a material, such as a dental appliance or orthodontic wire, can stretch or bend and still go back to its original shape.

Think of it like this: you have a spring that you’re stretching. At first, it stretches easily and returns to its original shape when you let go. But if you keep pulling harder and harder, there will come a point where the spring doesn’t go back to its original shape anymore. It gets permanently stretched or bent. That’s the elastic limit.

In dentistry, materials like orthodontic wires or dental retainers need to be able to flex or bend without permanently changing their shape. The elastic limit tells us how much bending or stretching a material can handle before it gets permanently deformed.

So, the elastic limit is like a limit or a point where a material can’t stretch or bend anymore without getting permanently changed. In dentistry, it’s important to know the elastic limit of materials to make sure they can withstand the forces they’ll encounter without getting permanently deformed or damaged.

Proportional Limit – Concept Explained

Sure! Let’s imagine you have a rubber band. When you stretch it, it gets longer, right? But if you stretch it too much, it might break! The proportional limit in dentistry is like the maximum stretchiness a material can handle without breaking or permanently changing its shape.

Think of it like this: you have a rubber band that you’re stretching. At first, it stretches easily and returns to its original size when you let go. But if you keep pulling harder and harder, there will come a point where the rubber band won’t stretch anymore and it starts to get permanently longer. That’s the proportional limit.

In dentistry, materials like braces wires or orthodontic appliances need to be able to handle forces without getting permanently deformed or breaking. The proportional limit tells us how much force or pressure a material can handle before it changes shape or breaks.

So, the proportional limit is like a limit or a point where a material can’t stretch anymore without getting damaged. In dentistry, it’s important to know the proportional limit of materials to make sure they can withstand the forces they’ll encounter without breaking or getting permanently deformed.

Elastic Modulus – Concept Explained

Certainly! In dentistry, elastic modulus is a property that helps us understand how strong or flexible materials used for dental treatments are. Let me explain it using an example.

Think of a rubber band again, but this time, let’s imagine it’s a special rubber band that dentists use for braces. When you wear braces, the dentist puts these little brackets on your teeth and connects them with a rubber band.

Now, different people have different teeth, right? Some people’s teeth might be very close together, while others might have more space between their teeth. Dentists use different types of rubber bands depending on how much space there is between the teeth.

If your teeth have a lot of space between them, the dentist will use a rubber band with a low elastic modulus. This means the rubber band is stretchier and more flexible. It can be easily stretched to connect the brackets and close the gaps between your teeth.

But if your teeth are very close together, the dentist will use a rubber band with a high elastic modulus. This rubber band is stronger and less stretchy. It will help your teeth stay in place without stretching too much.

So, in dentistry, the elastic modulus helps dentists choose the right materials, like rubber bands, that are strong enough to move your teeth or hold them in place but still flexible enough to avoid hurting your mouth.

I hope that helps you understand what elastic modulus means in dentistry!

Prosthodontic Strategies for Bruxism Management and Dental Protection

Bruxism, which is characterized by the repetitive clenching or grinding of teeth, is a common phenomenon that can have negative consequences on oral health and overall well-being (Yap & Chua, 2016). It is important to manage bruxism to prevent dental problems such as tooth wear, fractures of dental restorations, and pain in the oro-facial region (Koyano et al., 2008). The management strategies for bruxism mainly focus on reducing the potential negative consequences and controlling the symptoms associated with bruxism (Gouw et al., 2018).

One approach to managing bruxism is through the use of occlusal splints or oral appliances. Occlusal splints are commonly used for the diagnosis and treatment of bruxism, and they work by providing a protective barrier between the upper and lower teeth, reducing the impact of grinding and clenching (Ali et al., 2023). These splints can be effective in preventing tooth wear and reducing muscle pain and headaches associated with bruxism (Raby et al., 2018). However, it is important to note that occlusal splints do not eliminate bruxism, but rather serve as a means of managing its consequences (Raby et al., 2018).

Another management strategy for bruxism is the use of botulinum toxin injections into the masseter muscles. This treatment temporarily reduces the frequency of bruxism events and can provide relief from symptoms such as muscle pain and headaches (Serrera-Figallo et al., 2020). However, it is important to note that the current treatment modalities for bruxism are not effective and feasible for most patients with sleep bruxism (Gouw et al., 2018). Therefore, a multimodal approach that combines different treatment modalities may be recommended for managing bruxism (Gouw et al., 2018).

In addition to these treatment modalities, it is important to consider the underlying causes and contributing factors of bruxism. Bruxism is believed to be regulated centrally, with pathophysiological and psychosocial factors playing a role in its development (Yap & Chua, 2016). Stress sensitivity and anxious personality traits have been identified as potential factors that may contribute to bruxism activities and temporomandibular pain (Manfredini et al., 2017). Therefore, addressing these factors through stress management techniques, relaxation training, and behavioral therapy may be beneficial in managing bruxism (Kumar et al., 2022).

Furthermore, the management of bruxism should also take into consideration the potential impact on dental restorations and implants. Bruxism is considered a contraindication for dental implants, as it may cause overload and failure of the implants (Lobbezoo et al., 2006). Therefore, careful consideration should be given to the use of dental implants in patients with bruxism, and protective measures such as occlusal guards may be recommended to minimize the risk of implant failure (Yang et al., 2022).

It is worth noting that the management of bruxism should be tailored to the individual patient, taking into account their specific needs and circumstances. The use of observational and non-interventional management strategies may be appropriate for younger children, as the majority of bruxist children do not continue to brux during adolescence and adulthood (Manfredini et al., 2013). On the other hand, adults with bruxism may require more comprehensive management strategies to address the consequences of bruxism and alleviate symptoms (Manfredini et al., 2019).

In conclusion, the management of bruxism involves a combination of strategies aimed at reducing the negative consequences of bruxism and controlling its symptoms. These strategies may include the use of occlusal splints, botulinum toxin injections, stress management techniques, and behavioral therapy. It is important to tailor the management approach to the individual patient and consider the potential impact on dental restorations and implants. Further research is needed to better understand the underlying causes of bruxism and develop more effective treatment modalities.

References:

Ali, F., Alsheri, M., Shami, S., Mohana, A., Abujamilah, E., Alshehri, F. (2023). A Case Report Of Bruxism and Its Management With The Help Of Occlusal Splints.. Int J Life Sci Pharm Res. https://doi.org/10.22376/ijlpr.2023.13.2.l27-l30 Ali, S., Alqutaibi, A., Aboalrejal, A., Elawady, D. (2021). Botulinum Toxin and Occlusal Splints For The Management Of Sleep Bruxism In Individuals With Implant Overdentures: A Randomized Controlled Trial. The Saudi Dental Journal, 8(33), 1004-1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2021.07.001 Gouw, S., Wijer, A., Kalaykova, S., Creugers, N. (2018). Masticatory Muscle Stretching For the Management Of Sleep Bruxism: A Randomised Controlled Trial. J Oral Rehabil, 10(45), 770-776. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12694 Koyano, K., Tsukiyama, Y., Ichiki, R., T, K. (2008). Assessment Of Bruxism In the Clinic. J Oral Rehabil, 7(35), 495-508. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2008.01880.x Kumar, A., Nair, A., Faizal, F., S, S., Prasad, M. (2022). Diagnosis and Management Of Sleep Bruxism. JPID. https://doi.org/10.55231/jpid.2022.v05.i02.04 Lobbezoo, F., Brouwers, J., Cune, M., Naeije, M. (2006). Dental Implants In Patients With Bruxing Habits. J Oral Rehabil, 2(33), 152-159. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01542.x Manfredini, D., Ahlberg, J., Winocur, E., Lobbezoo, F. (2015). Management Of Sleep Bruxism In Adults: a Qualitative Systematic Literature Review. J Oral Rehabil, 11(42), 862-874. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12322 Manfredini, D., Colonna, A., Bracci, A., Lobbezoo, F. (2019). Bruxism: a Summary Of Current Knowledge On Aetiology, Assessment And Management. Oral Surg, 4(13), 358-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/ors.12454 Manfredini, D., Restrepo, C., Díaz-Serrano, K., Winocur, E., Lobbezoo, F. (2013). Prevalence Of Sleep Bruxism In Children: a Systematic Review Of The Literature. J Oral Rehabil, 8(40), 631-642. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12069 Manfredini, D., Serra-Negra, J., Carboncini, F., Lobbezoo, F. (2017). Current Concepts Of Bruxism. Int J Prosthodont, 5(30), 437-438. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.5210 Minervini, G., Fiorillo, L., Russo, D., Lanza, A., D’Amico, C., Cervino, G., … & Francesco, F. (2022). Prosthodontic Treatment In Patients With Temporomandibular Disorders and Orofacial Pain And/or Bruxism: A Review Of The Literature. Prosthesis, 2(4), 253-262. https://doi.org/10.3390/prosthesis4020025 Raby, I., Quiroz, D., Galleguillos, P. (2018). Freely Available or Over-the-counter Occlusal Splints Obtainable In Commercial Outlets: A Reality Dentists Should Know. J Oral Res, 7(7), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.17126/joralres.2018.063 Serrera-Figallo, M., Ruiz-de-León-Hernández, G., Torres-Lagares, D., Castro-Araya, A., Torres-Ferrerosa, O., Hernández-Pacheco, E., … & Gutiérrez-Pérez, J. (2020). Use Of Botulinum Toxin In Orofacial Clinical Practice. Toxins, 2(12), 112. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins12020112 Sriharsha, P., Gujjari, A., Dhakshaini, M., Prashant, A. (2018). Comparative Evaluation Of Salivary Cortisol Levels In Bruxism Patients Before and After Using Soft Occlusal Splint: An In Vivo Study. Contemp Clin Dent, 2(9), 182. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_756_17 Yang, J., Siow, L., Zhang, X., Wang, Y., Wang, H., Wang, B. (2022). Dental Reimplantation Treatment and Clinical Care For Patients With Previous Implant Failure—a Retrospective Study. IJERPH, 23(19), 15939. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315939 Yap, A., Chua, A. (2016). Sleep Bruxism: Current Knowledge and Contemporary Management. J Conserv Dent, 5(19), 383. https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.190007

Diagnosis Demystified – Case 19

A 62-year-old woman gives a history of a sharp pain lasting for a few seconds whenever she touches the skin over her lower jaw. It is making it difficult for her to carry out daily activities like washing her face or eating. The pain is confined to the left-hand side. Once an episode of pain is complete she can be pain free for about an hour, even if she touches her face in the area affected by the pain. She has been taking paracetamol at regular intervals but this has made no difference to the pain.

The patient gives a classic description including the distribution of pain, trigger zone and a refractory period after stimulation. While Trigeminal neuralgia (classical trigeminal neuralgia; CTN) is highly likely, MRI is obligatory to exclude STN and assess the possibility of DREZ compression.

Trigeminal neuralgia is a disorder characterized by paroxysms of high-intensity facial pain in the distribution of the fifth cranial nerve (Katusic et al., 1990). The treatment options for trigeminal neuralgia include both medical and surgical approaches. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine are the first-line pharmacological treatments for trigeminal neuralgia (Szok et al., 2019; Stefano et al., 2021). However, if these drugs fail to provide sufficient pain relief or are poorly tolerated, other medications such as lamotrigine, baclofen, gabapentin, pregabalin, and botulinum toxin type A may be considered (Stefano et al., 2021). Surgical options include microvascular decompression (MVD), which involves relieving vascular compression of the trigeminal nerve (Broggi et al., 2000). Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) can also be used for tumor-related trigeminal neuralgia (Kano et al., 2010). In cases where medical therapies and surgical procedures are ineffective, neuromodulation techniques may be considered (Chung & Huh, 2022). It is important to note that the choice of treatment depends on the individual patient’s condition and response to previous treatments (Perszke et al., 2022).

References:

Broggi, G., Ferroli, P., Franzini, A., Servello, D., Dones, I. (2000). Microvascular Decompression For Trigeminal Neuralgia: Comments On a Series Of 250 Cases, Including 10 Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1(68), 59-64. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp.68.1.59 Chung, M., Huh, R. (2022). Neuromodulation For Trigeminal Neuralgia. J Korean Neurosurg Soc, 5(65), 640-651. https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2022.0004 Kano, H., Awan, N., Flannery, T., Iyer, A., Flickinger, J., Lunsford, L., … & Kondziolka, D. (2010). Stereotactic Radiosurgery For Patients With Trigeminal Neuralgia Associated With Petroclival Meningiomas. Stereotact Funct Neurosurg, 1(89), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1159/000321187 Katusic, S., Beard, C., Bergstralh, E., Kurland, L. (1990). Incidence and Clinical Features Of Trigeminal Neuralgia, Rochester, Minnesota, 1945-1984. Ann Neurol., 1(27), 89-95. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.410270114 Perszke, M., Egierska, D., Martynowicz, P. (2022). Trigeminal Neuralgia – Where Are We Today?. J Educ Health Sport, 9(12), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.12775/jehs.2022.12.09.015 Stefano, G., Nurmikko, T., Zakrzewska, J. (2021). Treatment Of Trigeminal Neuralgia: Pharmacological., 89-104. https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198871606.003.0009 Szok, D., Tajti, J., Nyári, A., Vécsei, L. (2019). Therapeutic Approaches For Peripheral and Central Neuropathic Pain. BN, (2019), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8685954

    Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin in Periodontal Regeneration

    Revolutionizing Periodontal Regeneration: The Power of Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)”

    Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) is an autologous platelet concentrate that has been studied for its potential in improving the effect of periodontal regeneration (Chen et al., 2021). PRF is a type of platelet concentrate that is easy to obtain and cost-effective (Chen et al., 2021). It has been validated as an entirely autologous, injectable cell delivery system that overcomes histocompatibility issues related to synthetic scaffolds (Chen & Liu, 2016). PRF is non-cytotoxic, biocompatible, and non-immunogenic, making it suitable for use in tissue engineering (Chen & Liu, 2016). It has been characterized morphologically, in terms of cell content and protein composition, to better understand its clinical effects and improve clinical guidelines for various medical applications (Varela et al., 2018).

    PRF has been investigated for its antimicrobial efficacy in the treatment of periodontal soft- and hard-tissue regeneration (Kour et al., 2018). It has been compared to other platelet concentrates, such as platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), and has shown similar effectiveness in periodontal bone regeneration (Lei et al., 2019). The use of PRF in combination with other agents, such as 1% alendronate, has been proposed to enhance bone formation and reduce bone resorption in regenerative periodontal treatment (Li et al., 2019). However, there is a lack of evidence-based studies to determine the superiority of this concurrent application (Li et al., 2019).

    PRF has been shown to promote craniofacial bone regeneration through the activation of the Runx2 pathway (Li et al., 2014). It is a second-generation platelet concentrate that is prepared from centrifuged blood and is strictly autologous (Li et al., 2014). PRF has been investigated as a wound healing promoter in various clinical applications, including periodontal regeneration (Tavelli et al., 2022). It is one of the autologous platelet concentrates that are generated after the centrifugation of the patient’s blood to obtain fractions containing a supraphysiologic concentration of platelets and growth factors (Tavelli et al., 2022).

    Injectable platelet-rich fibrin (I-PRF) is a liquid autologous platelet concentrate that has been introduced as a low-cost alternative to PRF (Alshoiby et al., 2023). It has been used in combination with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) in the treatment of intrabony defects in patients with stage-III periodontitis (Alshoiby et al., 2023). I-PRF contains growth/differentiation factors, including bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), which promote periodontal repair and regeneration (Alshoiby et al., 2023).

    PRF has been studied in the context of dental tissue engineering, where it has shown potential for use in tooth rejuvenation and the enhancement of osteogenic differentiation (Zhao & Gao, 2023). It has been injected into the root canal of necrotic teeth and has been found to promote dentinal wall thickening, root extension, reduction of periapical lesions, and apical closure (Zhao & Gao, 2023). Additionally, PRF has been used in combination with collagen chitosan hydrogel to promote alkaline phosphatase activity and calcium deposition in osteoblast-like cell lines (Sidharta et al., 2023).

    The efficacy of PRF in periodontal regeneration has been evaluated in various clinical trials and systematic reviews. A systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the use of PRF in the treatment of periodontal intrabony defects and found positive effects on clinical and radiological outcomes (Chen et al., 2021). Another systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the clinical efficacy of PRF in periodontal regeneration and found significant improvements in probing pocket depth and clinical attachment level (Oza et al., 2023). A randomized controlled clinical trial compared the use of injectable PRF with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft to demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft alone in intrabony defects and found significant improvements in pocket probing depth, clinical attachment level, and bone fill with the combination treatment (Alshoiby et al., 2023).

    In conclusion, PRF is an autologous platelet concentrate that has been studied for its potential in periodontal regeneration. It has been characterized morphologically, in terms of cell content and protein composition, and has been shown to be non-cytotoxic, biocompatible, and non-immunogenic. PRF has been compared to other platelet concentrates and has shown similar effectiveness in periodontal bone regeneration. It has been used in combination with other agents, such as 1% alendronate and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft, to enhance bone formation and reduce bone resorption. PRF has been investigated in various clinical trials and systematic reviews, which have demonstrated its positive effects on clinical and radiological outcomes in periodontal regeneration.

    References:

    Alshoiby, M., El-Sayed, K., Elbattawy, W., Hosny, M. (2023). Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin With Demineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft Compared To Demineralized Freeze-dried Bone Allograft In Intrabony Defects Of Patients With Stage-iii Periodontitis: a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Clin Oral Invest, 7(27), 3457-3467. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-023-04954-y Chen, F., Liu, X. (2016). Advancing Biomaterials Of Human Origin For Tissue Engineering. Progress in Polymer Science, (53), 86-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2015.02.004 Chen, L., Ding, Y., Wang, W., Meng, S. (2021). Use Of Platelet-rich Fibrin In the Treatment Of Periodontal Intrabony Defects: A Systematic Review And Meta-analysis. BioMed Research International, (2021), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6669168 Kour, P., Pudakalkatti, P., Vas, A., Das, S., Padmanabhan, S. (2018). Comparative Evaluation Of Antimicrobial Efficacy Of Platelet-rich Plasma, Platelet-rich Fibrin, and Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin On The Standard Strains Of Porphyromonas Gingivalis And Aggregatibacter Actinomycetemcomitans. Contemp Clin Dent, 6(9), 325. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_367_18 Lei, L., Yu, Y., Han, J., Shi, D., Sun, W., Zhang, D., … & Chen, L. (2019). Quantification Of Growth Factors In Advanced Platelet‐rich Fibrin and Concentrated Growth Factors And Their Clinical Efficacy As Adjunctive To The Gtr Procedure In Periodontal Intrabony Defects. J Periodontol, 4(91), 462-472. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.19-0290 Li, F., Jiang, P., Pan, J., Liu, C., Zheng, L. (2019). Synergistic Application Of Platelet-rich Fibrin and 1% Alendronate In Periodontal Bone Regeneration: A Meta-analysis. BioMed Research International, (2019), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9148183 Li, Q., Reed, D., Min, L., Gopinathan, G., Li, S., Dangaria, S., … & Diekwisch, T. (2014). Lyophilized Platelet-rich Fibrin (Prf) Promotes Craniofacial Bone Regeneration Through Runx2. IJMS, 5(15), 8509-8525. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms15058509 Oza, D., Dhadse, D., Bajaj, D., Bhombe, D., Durge, D., Subhadarsanee, D., … & Hassan, D. (2023). Clinical Efficacy Of Titanium Prepared Platelet Rich Fibrin In Periodontal Regeneration: a Systematic Review And Meta-analysis. F1000Res, (12), 393. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.131461.1 Sidharta, K., Suryono, -., Murdiastuti, K., Pritia, M. (2023). Effect Of Collagen Chitosan Hydrogel With Injectable Platelet-rich Fibrin On Alkaline Phosphatase Activity and Calcium Deposition An In Vitro Study On Osteoblast-like Cell Line Mg63.. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2948824/v1 Tavelli, L., Chen, C., Barootchi, S., Kim, D. (2022). Efficacy Of Biologics For the Treatment Of Periodontal Infrabony Defects: An American Academy Of Periodontology Best Evidence Systematic Review And Network Meta‐analysis. Journal of Periodontology, 12(93), 1803-1826. https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.22-0120 Varela, H., Souza, J., Nascimento, R., Júnior, R., Vasconcelos, R., Cavalcante, R., … & Araújo, A. (2018). Injectable Platelet Rich Fibrin: Cell Content, Morphological, and Protein Characterization. Clin Oral Invest, 3(23), 1309-1318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-018-2555-2 Zhao, Z., Gao, L. (2023). Stem Cells, Scaffolds, and Growth Factors In Dental Tissue Engineering.. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2673569