Choosing the Right Needle

Endodontic success is contingent upon meticulous debridement, shaping, and disinfection of the root canal system. Among the numerous factors influencing treatment outcomes, irrigation needle selection is an often-overlooked yet critical determinant of efficacy. The choice of needle gauge directly impacts the delivery of irrigants, ensuring optimal penetration, minimal apical extrusion, and maximal bacterial eradication. This article explores the scientific rationale behind needle gauge selection and its implications for clinical practice.

The Role of Needle Gauge in Endodontic Irrigation

Root canal irrigation serves multiple objectives: mechanical flushing of debris, dissolution of organic matter, microbial disinfection, and smear layer removal. The gauge of the irrigation needle determines the flow dynamics, pressure distribution, and depth of penetration within the canal. The ideal needle must navigate the complex anatomy of the root canal while facilitating efficient irrigant exchange without causing undue apical pressure.

Comparative Analysis of Commonly Used Needle Gauges

Gauge (G)External Diameter (mm)Clinical Considerations
21G0.81Rarely used due to excessive size and risk of irrigant extrusion
23G0.64Suitable for wide canals but limits depth of penetration
25G0.51Balances flow rate with controlled delivery
27G0.39Optimal for most cases; allows deeper penetration while minimizing extrusion
28G0.36Enhances precision for minimally invasive approaches
30G0.30Preferred for deep, narrow canals requiring delicate irrigation

Fluid Dynamics and Needle Design

The efficiency of irrigation is not solely dictated by gauge but also by the design of the needle tip. Side-vented needles, for example, reduce the risk of apical extrusion by directing flow laterally rather than apically. Additionally, advances in computational fluid dynamics have demonstrated that smaller gauge needles create more turbulent flow patterns, enhancing irrigant activation and biofilm disruption.

Advanced Irrigation Modalities: Beyond Traditional Needle Irrigation

While conventional needle irrigation remains the gold standard, emerging technologies aim to augment disinfection through enhanced fluid dynamics and activation mechanisms:

  • Ultrasonic and Sonic Activation: Agitates the irrigant to improve penetration into lateral canals and dentinal tubules.
  • Photoactivated Disinfection: Employs photosensitizers and light energy to generate reactive oxygen species for microbial eradication.
  • Electrochemically Activated Solutions (e.g., Sterilox): Generates hypochlorous acid and free chlorine radicals, enhancing antimicrobial efficacy while maintaining biocompatibility.
  • IntraLight UV Disinfection: Uses a 254 nm UV intracanal illuminator to eliminate residual microbial biofilms.

Clinical Implications and Future Directions

The evolution of endodontic irrigation strategies underscores the growing emphasis on precision-driven, minimally invasive techniques. While the 27-gauge needle remains the most widely adopted due to its balance of penetration and safety, ongoing research into fluid dynamics, antimicrobial solutions, and activation methods promises to redefine the standard of care.

As endodontic irrigation techniques continue to advance, the selection of an appropriate needle gauge must be guided by both anatomical considerations and the latest evidence-based protocols. A nuanced understanding of irrigation dynamics will not only improve disinfection efficacy but also contribute to superior long-term treatment outcomes.

Conclusion

Endodontics is no longer just about mechanical instrumentation; it is an interdisciplinary science integrating fluid mechanics, microbiology, and material science. The seemingly simple decision of needle gauge selection is, in reality, a critical component of treatment success. By refining our approach to irrigation, we can elevate endodontic outcomes, ensuring that root canal therapy is not only effective but also biologically sound.

Restoring Fractured Teeth in Patients with Parafunctional Habits: Key Considerations

A 43-year-old patient presents with a fractured palatal cusp of an upper five after eating a sandwich. On examination, the following were found.

  • Extraoral: large masseters, bitten fingernails.
  • Intraoral: healthy periodontium (no BPE >1). The palatal cusp of the upper vital and
    unrestored five is fractured subgingivally. Anterior tooth wear, dentine exposure on both upper canine cusp tips.

What is the mechanism leading to this problem?

The fractured palatal cusp of the upper premolar is likely due to excessive occlusal forces exerted over time, especially during parafunctional habits like bruxism (teeth grinding) or clenching. The patient’s large masseters and bitten fingernails suggest bruxism or clenching, which leads to increased stress on the teeth. Over time, this can weaken tooth structure, making it more susceptible to fracture, even during relatively low-stress activities like eating a sandwich.

What is the significance of the anterior wear?

The anterior wear, especially the dentine exposure on the upper canines, indicates a significant amount of tooth surface loss, typically caused by parafunctional habits like bruxism. Canines play a crucial role in guiding the occlusion and protecting the posterior teeth during lateral movements (canine guidance). The loss of this guidance could shift the load to other teeth, like the upper premolars, further contributing to their fracture. The exposed dentine also increases the risk of sensitivity and further wear.

What additional precautions might you take in this case when you plan for a definitive restorative work?

  1. Assessment of Parafunctional Habits: •Address the underlying cause of the excessive forces, likely bruxism or clenching. Consider a thorough evaluation and a potential referral to a specialist to assess for any contributing factors such as stress, anxiety, or sleep disorders. • Fabrication of a night guard (occlusal splint) may be recommended to protect the teeth from further damage.
    1. Occlusal Analysis:
      • Perform a detailed occlusal analysis to identify any interferences, especially in lateral and protrusive movements. Address occlusal discrepancies that could contribute to abnormal forces on teeth.
      • Check for the need to adjust canine guidance, as the wear may have altered the normal function.
    2. Restorative Material Selection:
      • Consider using a durable material such as porcelain, zirconia, or composite for the restoration, especially for posterior teeth under high stress.
      • A crown may be necessary for the fractured tooth to provide full coverage and strength, particularly if the fracture is subgingival.
    3. Subgingival Fracture Considerations:
      • Ensure proper isolation during restorative procedures, as the subgingival fracture may complicate the seating of a restoration.
      • Crown lengthening or orthodontic extrusion may be required to ensure that the margins of the restoration are accessible and that a proper seal can be achieved without violating the biological width.
    4. Patient Education and Follow-up:
      • Educate the patient about the potential for ongoing damage if bruxism is not managed.
      • Regular follow-up is important to monitor the restoration and assess for further wear or damage due to parafunctional habits.

References: Practical Procedures in Dental Occlusion, First Edition. Ziad Al-Ani and Riaz Yar. © 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Occluding effects of dentinal tubules

The occluding effects of dentinal tubules have been extensively studied in the literature. Various materials and techniques have been evaluated for their effectiveness in occluding dentinal tubules and reducing dentin hypersensitivity.

Chen et al. [1] compared the effectiveness of red propolis extract (RPE), calcium sodium phosphosilicate (Novamin), and arginine-calcium carbonate (ACC) in occluding dentine tubules. They found that RPE demonstrated a higher degree of occlusion following acid challenge, while ACC showed more occlusion following treatment.

Davies et al [2] evaluated the efficacy of an arginine-containing dentifrice, two strontium-based products, and a fluoride control in occluding dentinal tubules. The study used dentine specimens with patent tubules and found that all the tested pastes were effective in occluding the tubules when subjected to acid challenge.

Bae et al. [3] investigated the effects of poly(amidoamine) dendrimer-coated mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (PAMAM@MBN) on dentin remineralization. The study demonstrated that PAMAM@MBN had a better occluding effect for dentinal tubules compared to mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles (MBN).

Mahmoodi et al. [4] conducted a quantitative assessment of dentine mineralization and tubule occlusion by NovaMin and stannous fluoride. They compared different in-vitro techniques and found that current techniques used to determine tubule occlusion do not provide the depth of occlusion and are time-consuming and expensive.

Yu et al. [5] developed epigallocatechin-3-gallate-encapsulated nanohydroxyapatite/mesoporous silica (EGCG@nHAp@MSN) and evaluated its occluding effects on dentinal tubules. The study demonstrated that EGCG@nHAp@MSN effectively occluded dentinal tubules, reduced dentin permeability, and inhibited the formation and growth of S. mutans biofilm on the dentin surface.

Deus et al. [6] investigated the influence of filling technique on the depth of tubule penetration by root canal sealer. They found that different root-filling techniques influenced the penetration ability of the filling material into the dentinal tubules. Techniques such as the Thermafil system and warm vertical condensation of gutta-percha promoted deeper tubule penetration.

G et al. [7] mentioned that many studies have used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to observe the occlusion of open dentinal tubules after treatment. Numerous studies have focused on the decrease of sensitivity following tubule occlusion.

Berg et al. [8] evaluated the occluding effect and efficacy of amorphous calcium magnesium phosphate (ACMP) particles as an occluding agent. The study demonstrated that ACMP particles incorporated in a gel could penetrate the tubules and occlude exposed tubules.

Tian et al. [9] studied the effect of mesoporous silica nanoparticles on dentinal tubule occlusion. They found that nanomaterials with superior dispersion, such as mesoporous silica nanoparticles, can easily enter dentinal tubules and be prime candidates for tubule occlusion.

Ramos et al. [10] investigated the effect of different toothpastes on the permeability and roughness of eroded dentin. They found that fluoride toothpastes occluded dentinal tubules and increased roughness, with sodium fluoride (NaF) toothpaste promoting a greater decrease in dentin permeability.

In conclusion, various materials and techniques have been studied for their occluding effects on dentinal tubules. These studies have evaluated the effectiveness of different substances, such as red propolis extract, calcium sodium phosphosilicate, arginine-calcium carbonate, poly(amidoamine) dendrimer-coated mesoporous bioactive glass nanoparticles, epigallocatechin-3-gallate-encapsulated nanohydroxyapatite/mesoporous silica, amorphous calcium magnesium phosphate particles, and mesoporous silica nanoparticles. The occlusion of dentinal tubules has been shown to reduce dentin hypersensitivity and improve the stability and permeability of the dentin surface. These findings contribute to the understanding of dentin hypersensitivity and provide insights into potential treatments for this common dental condition.

References: [1] Chen, C., Parolia, A., Pau, A., Porto, I. (2015). Comparative Evaluation Of the Effectiveness Of Desensitizing Agents In Dentine Tubule Occlusion Using Scanning Electron Microscopy. Aust Dent J, 1(60), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12275 [2] Davies, M., Paice, E., Jones, S., Leary, S., Curtis, A., West, N. (2011). Efficacy Of Desensitizing Dentifrices To Occlude Dentinal Tubules. European Journal of Oral Sciences, 6(119), 497-503. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2011.00872.x [3] Bae, J., Son, W., Yoo, K., Yoon, S., Bae, M., Lee, D., … & Kim, Y. (2019). Effects Of Poly(amidoamine) Dendrimer-coated Mesoporous Bioactive Glass Nanoparticles On Dentin Remineralization. Nanomaterials, 4(9), 591. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano9040591 [4] Mahmoodi, B., Goggin, P., Fowler, C., Cook, R. (2020). Quantitative Assessment Of Dentine Mineralization and Tubule Occlusion By Novamin And Stannous Fluoride Using Serial Block Face Scanning Electron Microscopy. J Biomed Mater Res, 5(109), 717-722. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34737 [5] Yu, J., Yang, H., Li, K., Lei, J., Huang, C. (2017). Development Of Epigallocatechin-3-gallate-encapsulated Nanohydroxyapatite/mesoporous Silica For Therapeutic Management Of Dentin Surface. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 31(9), 25796-25807. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b06597 [6] Deus, G., Gurgel-Filho, E., Maniglia-Ferreira, C., Coulinho‐Filho, T. (2004). The Influence Of Filling Technique On Depth Of Tubule Penetration By Root Canal Sealer: a Study Using Light Microscopy And Digital Image Processing. Australian Endodontic Journal, 1(30), 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4477.2004.tb00164.x [7] G, K., A, L., N, A. (2013). An In Vitro Sem Study On the Effect Of Bleaching Gel Enriched With Novamin On Whitening Of Teeth And Dentinal Tubule Occlusion. JCDR. https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2013/5831.3841 [8] Berg, C., Unosson, E., Engqvist, H., Xia, W. (2020). Amorphous Calcium Magnesium Phosphate Particles For Treatment Of Dentin Hypersensitivity: a Mode Of Action Study. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 6(6), 3599-3607. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00262 [9] Tian, L., Peng, C., Shi, Y., Guo, X., Zhong, B., Qi, J., … & Cui, F. (2014). Effect Of Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles On Dentinal Tubule Occlusion: An In Vitro Study Using Sem and Image Analysis. Dent. Mater. J., 1(33), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2013-215 [10] Ramos, F., Delbem, A., Santos, P., Moda, M., Briso, A., Fagundes, T. (2022). Effect Of Different Toothpastes On Permeability and Roughness Of Eroded Dentin. AOL, 3(35), 229-237. https://doi.org/10.54589/aol.35/3/229

What is the prognosis for a cracked tooth?

  1. The prognosis for a cracked tooth is always going to be questionable (Rivera & Walton 2008).
  2. The prognosis is always better if the crack does not extend to the pulp chamber floor (Turp & Gobetti 1996; Sim et al. 2016).
  3. Vital is better than necrotic (Turp & Gobetti 1996).
  4. The quality of the restoration and whether a full coverage crown may cover the crack and other defects are considerations (Rivera & Walton 2008), as is whether an abscess or radiographic rarefaction is present prior to treatment.
  5. These two factors would lower the prognosis of the tooth in question (Berman & Kuttler 2010).
  6. One study found that cracked teeth had a two-year survival rate of 85.5% (Tan et al. 2006).
  7. Another study found that after five years, the survival rate of root-filled cracked teeth was 92%, with the odds of extraction increasing if the cracks were in the root (Sim et al. 2016).
  8. Finally, a recent study from Korea showed a 90%, two-year survival rate for a cracked tooth, probing depths greater than 6 mm being a signifi- cant factor in the prognosis (Kang et al. 2016).

What are the types of cracks one may see in a suspected tooth fracture?

According to the American Association of Endodontics (Rivera & Walton 2008), there are five categories of crack:

  • Craze lines: Only involving the enamel;
  • Split tooth: Complete fracture through the tooth, usually centered mesial to distal;
  • Fractured cusp: Usually non-centered and affect- ing one cusp;
  • Cracked tooth: An incomplete fracture that extends from the crown to the subgingival area of the tooth; and
  • Vertical Root Fracture (VRF):This may be sympto- matic or non- symptomatic.The majority of the VRFs are associated with root-filled teeth. It may be a complete or an incomplete fracture.

How is a fractured tooth diagnosed?

  1. There are multiple ways to determine whether or not a tooth is fractured. It is important to start with a good dental history of the tooth.
  2. A clinical exam should include a bite stick, ice for vitality testing, and a periodontal probing to check for deep narrow pockets.
  3. A radiographic exam is important to check for periapical rarefactions or possibly to reveal a fracture itself if it is large enough.
  4. Finally, a stain (methylene blue), or trans-illumination may be used to visualize the fracture.
  5. Sometimes the tooth may be mobile or a sinus tract may have developed due to fracture necrosis.
  6. If a tooth is non-vital with minimal or no restorations, suspect a crack or fracture (Berman & Kuttler 2010).
  7. The older the tooth, the more susceptible it is to fracture (Berman & Kuttler 2010).
  8. Cracked teeth are more commonly found in lower molars, followed by maxillary pre- molars (Cameron 1976).
  9. Another study found that lower 2nd molars were more likely to have cracks after root canal treatment (Kang, Kim & Kim 2016).

Cracked tooth syndrome

  • It is characterized by sharp pain on chewing without any reason.
  • It caused by hidden crack of teeth.
  • These are incomplete fractures that are too small to be seen on radiographs.

Symptoms

  • Sharp fleeting pain
    • because when biting down,segments move apart. low pressure in nerves of pulp.
  • Bite release
    • segments snap back together sharply increasing the pressure causing pain.
  • Pain- which is inconsistent.

Causes

  • Attrition
  • Bruxism
  • Trauma
  • Accidental biting on hard object.
  • Presence of large restoration.
  • Improper endodontic treatment.
  • Craze line
  • Fractured cusp
  • Cracked tooth split tooth
  • Vertical root fracture

Treatment

  • Stabilization with stainless steel band.
  • Crown placement
  • Endodontic treatment
  • Restoration.