Pleomorphic Adenoma (Mixed Tumour)

Name suggested by Willis.
Most common neoplasm of salivary gland tumor.
Benign neoplasm- consisting of cells exhibiting the
ability to differentiate to epithelial (ductal and
nonductal) cells and mesenchymal (chondroid,
myxoid, osseous) cells.
Other names:

  1. Branchioma,
  2. enclavoma,
  3. teratoma,
  4. cyindroma,
  5. myxochondrocarcinoma.

Salivary gland tumor origin: EPITHELIAL

 Shows cytogenic abnormalities in chomosomes- 12q13-15.
 Putative pleomorphic adenoma gene(PLAG1) has been
mapped to chromosomes 8q12

Histogenesis:-

  • Currently, numerous theories centre around the myoepithelial cell and the reserve cell in the intercalated duct.
  • Ultrastructural studies have confirmed the presence of both ductal and myoepithelial cells in pleomorphic adenomas.
  • It follows that possibly either or both may play active roles in the histogenesis of the tumour.
  1. Hubner and his associates:- have postulated that the myoepithelial cell is responsible for the morphological diversity of the tumour, including the production of the fibrous, mucinous, chondroid and osseous areas.
  2. Regezi and Batsakis:- postulated that the intercalated duct reserve cell can differentiate into ductal and myoepithelial cells, and the latter, in turn, can undergo mesenchymal metaplasia, since they inherently have smooth muscle-like properties. Further differentiation into other mesenchymal cells then can occur.
  3. Batsakis:- has discussed salivary gland tumourigenesis, and while still implicating the intercalated duct reserve cell as the histogenetical precursor of the pleomorphic adenoma, stated that the role of the myoepithelial cell is still uncertain and that it may be either an active or a passive participant histogenetically.
  4. Finally, Dardick and his associates have questioned the role of both ductal reserve and myoepithelial cells. They stated that a neoplastically altered epithelial cell with the potential for multidirectional differentiation might be histogenetically responsible for pleomorphic adenoma.

CLINICAL FEATURES:-

Most common tumor.
 Rate of occurance: 60-70%- parotid glands
40-60%- submandibular glands
40-70%- minor salivary glands
seldomly- sublingual glands
 Age: 30-50 years
 Sex: female> male – 3:1 – 4:1
 In parotid- presents in the lower lobe of the superior lobe
as a mass over the angle of the mandible, below and infront
of the ear.

Clinical presentation: painless, slow growing, firm
mass, initially small in size and begins to increase in
size.
Initially movable but with continued growth become
more nodular and less movable.
Recurrent tumor- multinodular, fixed on palpation.
Palate – intraorally common site.
Seldom ulcerated- unless secondarily traumatized.

 

Slowly growing tumor of
The parotid gland.

HISTOPATHOLOGY:-

 HALLMARK: Morphologic Diversity.
 Charecterized by- Variable, Diverse, Structural & histologic
patterns.
 It demonstrate glandular epithelium and mesenchyme like
tissue and the proportion of each component varies widely.
 Typically a well-circumscribed encapsulated tumor
 The epithelium often forms ducts and cystic structures or may
occur as islands or sheets of cells , anastomosing cords and foci
of Keratinizing squamous cells and spindle cells .

  • Foote and Frazell (1954) categorized PA into:
    a) Primarilly myxoid (36%)
    b) Myxoid and cellular component in equal proportions
    (30%)
    c) Predominantly cellular (22%)
    d) Extremely cellular (12%)

Myoepithelial cells are major component of PA.
 Have variable morphology- sometimes appearing as
angular or spindled, some with eccentric nucleus
resembling plasma cells.
 Are responsible for characteristic mesenchyme like
changes.
 Vacuolar degeneration of myoepithelial cells can produce a
chondroid appearance.
 the stroma exhibits areas of an eosinophilic hyalinized change,
fat or osteoid also is seen.

 

DIFFIRENTIAL DIAGNOSIS:-

 Polymorphous low grade adenocarcinoma, PLGA
 Adenoid cystic carcinoma, AdCC
 Epithelial myoepithelial carcinoma, EMC
 Squamous cell carcinoma, SCC
 Mucoepidermoid carcinoma, MEC

TREATMENT:-

 Surgical excision
 Superficial parotidectomy with preservation of the facial nerve
 Local enucleation should be avoided – resulting in seeding of
the tumor bed.
 Deep lobe of the parotid- total parotidectomy is usually
necessary also with preservation of the facial nerve.

 Submandibular tumors – Total removal of the gland with the
tumor.
 Malignant degeneration is a potential complication, resulting in
a carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma.
 The risk of malignant transformation is probably small, but it
may occur in as many as 5% of all cases.

REFERENCES:-

1.Shafers- 8e

2.Nevill’s-3rd e

3.Maji Jose

4.GOOGLE Images

Calcifying Odontogenic Cyst (COC)

DEF:-Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC), previously known as Gorlin cyst, is a rare, well-circumscribed, solid or cystic lesion derived from odontogenic epithelium that resembles follicular ameloblastoma but contains ‘ghost cells’ and spherical calcifications.

Other Names:-

1.Keratinizing and/or Calcifying Epithelial Odontogenic Cyst,

2.Gorlin Cyst

3.Cystic Keratinizing Tumour

4.Dentinogenic Ghost Cell Tumour

5.Odontogenic ghost cell cyst 

  • It Has many features of odontogenic tumor, therefore it is placed in the category of tumors in the latest WHO classification of odontogenic cysts and tumors.
  • In the latest WHO publication on odontogenic tumours (Prætorius and Ledesma-Montes, 2005) it was classified as a benign odontogenic tumour and was renamed calcifying  cystic odontogenic tumour (CCOT).
  • CLINICAL FEATURES:-
  1. Age : Wide range, peak in 2nd decade.
  2. Sex : Equal.
  3. Site : Anterior segment of both jaws
  • Calcifying odontogenic cysts that are associated with odontomas tend to occur in younger patients, with a mean age of 17 years.

  • PATHOGENESIS:-
  • COC is a unicystic process and develops from the reduced dental epithelium or remnants of dental lamina.
  • The cyst lining has the potential to induce formation of dentinoid or even odontoma in adjacent CT wall.
  • CLASSIFICATION OF THE ODONTOGENIC GHOST  CELL LESIONS:-
  1. Group 1 : ‘Simple’ cysts Calcifying odontogenic cyst (COC)
  2. Group 2 : Cysts associated with odontogenic hamartomas or benign neoplasms: calcifying cystic odontogenic tumours (CCOT).
  3. Group 3 : Solid benign odontogenic neoplasms with similar cell morphology to that in the COC, and with dentinoid Formation
  4. .Group 4 : Malignant odontogenic neoplasms with features similar to those of the dentinogenic ghost cell tumour Ghost cell odontogenic carcinoma.
  • SIGNS & SYMPTOMS:-
  1. Swelling is the commonest complaint, seldom associated with pain.
  2. Intraosseous lesions can cause hard bony expansion and resulting facial asymmetry.
  3. Displacement of teeth can also occur.
  • RADIOLOGICAL FEATURES:-
  1. Intraosseous lesions produce well defined lucency which  is usually unilocular.
  2. Irregular calcified masses of varying sizes may be seen within the lucency.
  3. Displacement of root/roots with or without root resorption and expansion of  cortical plates also seen.

*Radiograph of a calcifying odontogenic cyst with well-demarcated  margins extending from the right to the left premolar regions of the  mandible. Numerous calcifications are present, some suggestive of  small denticles.

  • HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES:-
  1. Lining is usually thin about 6 – 8 cell thick, may be thickened in other areas.
  2. Lining shows characteristic odontogenic features with reversely polarized basal cell layer.
  3. TYPICALLY – GHOST CELLS may be seen in thicker areas of lining.
  4. Ghost cells are enlarged, ballooned, ovoid, eosinophilic cells with well

defined cell boundaries.

5.Some times many cells may fuse.

6.They represent abnormal keratinization and frequently calcify.

7.Tubular dentinoid and even complex odontome may be found in connective tissue wall close to epithelial lining.

Histological features of a calcifying odontogenic cyst with clusters  of fusiform ghost cells and focal calcifications, lying in a stratified  squamous epithelium.
In this calcifying odontogenic cyst, there are sheets of ghost cells  and a focal area in which there has been induction of a strip of  dysplastic dentine (dentinoid).
  • DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS:-

Based on radiographic appearance, following lesions must be included in the provisional diagnosis –

  1. Ameloblastoma
  2. CEOT
  3. AOT
  4. Ameloblastic fibro odontoma

References :-

1.Shafers- 8e

2.Neville -3e

3.Google-Slideshare

HISTOPATHOLOGY OF BONE LESIONS

BY Dr. KRITI NAJA JAIN :-

1. FIBROUS DYSPLASIA :-

Def:- Fibrous dysplasia is an uncommon nonhereditary, developmental anomaly of the bone due to a defect in osteoblastic differentiation and maturation.

HISTOPATHOLOGY:

  • Microscopic finding of fibrous dysplasia show irregularly shaped trabeculae of immature (woven) bone in a cellular, loosely arranged fibrous stroma.
  • The bone trabeculae are not connected to each other . They often assume curvilinear shapes.
  • which have been likened to CHINESE script writing.
  • The bone trabeculae are considered to arise by metaplasia and are not  surrounded by plum appositional osteoblasta.

2. PAGET’S DISEASE (OSTEITIS DEFORMANS):-

Def:- Paget’s disease of bone is a condition characterized by abnormal and anarchic resorption and deposition of bone, resulting in distortion and weakening of the
affected bones.

HISTOPATHOLOGY:-

  • Microscopic examination shows an apparent uncontrolled alternating resorption and formation of bone.
  • in the active resorption stages, numerous osteoclasts surround bone trabeculae and show evidence of resorption activity.
  • Simultaneously ,osteoclastic activity is seen with formation of osteoid rims around bone trabeculae .
  • A highly vascular fibrous C.T. replaces the marrow .
  • A characteristic microscopic feature is the presence of basophilic reversal lines in the bone.
  • These lines indicate the junction between alternating resorptive and formative phase of the bone and result in a ” JIGSAW PUZZLE” or “MOSAIC” appearance of the bone.
  • In the less active phases ,large masses of dense bone showing prominent reversal lines are present.

3. CENTRAL GAINT CELL GRANULOMA(GIANT CELL LESION; GIANT CELL TUMOR):-

Def :- Central giant cell granuloma (CGCG) is an uncommon, benign and proliferative lesion whose aetiology is not defined. Central giant cell granuloma is a relatively common benign intraosseous destructive giant cell lesion, which often affects the anterior part of the jawbone. By seeing clinical and radiographically , CGCG is divided into two types:-

1. Nonaggressive lesions make up most cases, exhibit few or no symptoms, demonstrate slow growth, and do not show cortical perforation or root resorption of teeth involved in the lesion.
2. Aggressive lesions are characterized by pain, rapid growth, cortical perforation, and root resorption. They show a marked tendency to recur after treatment, compared with the nonaggressive types.

HISTOPATHOLOGY:-

  • Lesional tissue is composed of highly cellular connective tissue stroma with numerous spindle shaped cells.
  • Multinucleated giant cells are distributed in this C.T.
  • Mesenchymal cells
  • Gaint cells are large with many nuclei upto 20 or more.
  • Gaint cells are usually aggregated close to the blood vessels.

REFERENCE:-

1.Maji Jose 2nd edition

HISTOPATHOLOGY OF SKIN LESIONS

BY: Dr.Kriti Naja Jain :-

1.LICHEN PLANUS:-

*Lichen planus is a chronic mucocutaneous disorder manifested in a various forms in the oral cavity.

*The most characteristic pattern is” RETICULAR TYPE” with the interlacing white stripe called “WICKHAM’S STRIAE”.

*HISTOPATHOLOGY:-

  •   Histopathology FIRST DESCRIBED BY DUBRENILL 1906
  • later revised by Shklar in 1972
  • Hyper orthokeratinisation or hyper parakeratinisation
  • ◦Thickening of granular layer
  • ◦Acanthosis of spinous layer
  • ◦Intercellular oedema in spinous layer
  • ◦“ Saw-tooth” rete pegs
  • ◦Liquefaction necrosis of basal layer- Max Joseph spaces
  • Civatte ( hyaline or cytoid) bodies
  • ◦Juxta epithelial band of inflammatory cells
  • ◦An eosinophilic band may be seen just beneath the basement membrane and represent fibrin covering lamina propria.

2.PEMPHIGUS :-

Pmphigus is a tissue specific autoimmune disease affecting the skin and mucosa. Clinical manifestations is in the from of “vesiculobullous lesions”  that rupture to form ulcer and erosions .

*Vesiculobullous lesions develop due to immune mediated acantholysis causing intraepithelial vesicle formation.

*HISTOPATHOLOGY :-

  • Formation of the vesicle or bullae within the epithelium that often results in a supra-basilar spilt or separation.
    • Following this suprabasilar spilt in the epithelium, the basal cell layer remains attached to the lamina propria, and it often appears as a row-of-tomb stones.
    • Loss of intercellular bridges and collection of edema fluid result in acantolysis within the spinus cell layer, which causes disruption of the prickle cells.
    • As a result of acantholysis, clumps of large hyperchromatic epithelial cells desquamate that are often seen lying free within the vesicular fluid, these desquamated cells are often rounded and smooth in appearance and are known as “Tzanck cells”.
  • Small number of polymorphonuclear neutrophil (PMN) and lymphocytes may be found within the vesicular fluid, but there is minimum inflammatory cell infiltration in the underlying connective tissue (unlike any other vesiculobullous lesion).

3.PEMPHIGOID :-

Pemphigoid is a vesiculobullous lesions that develop due to an autoimmune reaction directed against some components of basement membrane.

*This results in seperation of epithelium from the connective tissue with sub epithelial vesicles formation .

*Bullous pemphigoid and cicatricial pemphigoid are two different types of pemphigoid lesions.

*HISTOPATHOLOGY:-

  • The inflammatory infiltrate is typically polymorphous, with an eosinophilic predominance.
  • Mast cells and basophils may be prominent early in the disease course.
  • Electron microscope shows basement membrane attached to the connective tissue rather than overlying separated epithelium.
  • Tzanck smear shows only inflammatory cells.
  • Sub epithelial vehicle formation.
  • Intact epithelium without acantholysis.

REFERENCE:-

  1. Pic – Maji Josh 2nd edition