Vertical changes following orthodontic extraction treatment in skeletal open bite subjects

Managing skeletal anterior open bite (AOB) is one of the trickiest problems you’ll see in clinic. Decisions about which teeth to extract — or whether to extract at all — can change the vertical facial pattern, molar position, and ultimately whether the mandible rotates closed (helpful) or stays/re-rotates open (problematic). Understanding how extraction pattern, tooth movement, and growth stage interact helps you plan smarter treatments and set realistic expectations.

The study in one line

A prospective cephalometric study compared vertical/rotational changes in AOB patients treated with three extraction patterns: first premolars (E4)second premolars (E5), and first molars (E6) — and found that extraction choice (plus how posterior teeth move) influenced mandibular rotation. 

1. Extraction Choice & Mandibular Rotation

Extraction PatternSkeletal Open Bite InvolvementEffect on Mandibular Rotation
1st Premolars (E4)Anterior teeth onlyNo significant rotation.
2nd Premolars (E5)Extends to posterior teethClosing rotation
1st Molars (E6)Extends to posterior teethGreatest closing rotation

The logic behind those findings comes down to three biomechanical factors:

  1. Where the extraction space is (anterior vs. posterior in the arch)
  2. How molars move to close that space (translation vs. extrusion)
  3. How that movement interacts with mandibular rotation mechanics

2. Posterior Tooth Movement & Extrusion

  • E4: Greatest posterior tooth extrusion → prevents mandibular rotation.
    • The more teeth you move forward, the harder it is to prevent some extrusion of molars during protraction (especially without TADs or intrusion mechanics).
  • E5: Limited posterior extrusion → rotation occurs.
    • This shorter movement path makes vertical control easier — fewer teeth to drag along, less tendency for extrusion.
    • Reduced extrusion allows the posterior occlusal contacts to move out of the “palatomandibular wedge” and encourages mandibular closing rotation (SN–GoGn, SGn–NBa decrease).
  • E6: Large forward movement of molars with minimal extrusion → maximum rotation.
    • Posterior occlusal “block” is eliminated quickly, and molars protract mostly horizontally rather than extruding.
    • With posterior teeth moving forward and out of the wedge, the mandible is free to rotate up and forward the most.

3. Cephalometric Change Patterns

VariableE4E5E6
SN–GoGn↔ (no change)↓↓ (largest decrease)
SGn–NBa↑↑
ANS–Me / Na–Me↑↑ (largest increase)↑ (smallest)
Upper Molar–Palatal Plane↑↑
Lower Molar–Mand. Plane↑↑ (largest)

4. Clinical Tips

  • For AOB limited to anterior teeth: First premolar extraction may not help rotation—consider vertical control strategies.
    • Use gable bends, TADs for anchorage/vertical control, intrusion mechanics if needed.
    • Avoid mechanics or auxiliaries that encourage molar extrusion during space closure.
  • For AOB involving posterior teeth: Second premolar or first molar extraction preferred to facilitate mandibular closing rotation.
  • Minimize posterior tooth extrusion during protraction to enhance rotation.
  • Treat after peak pubertal growth spurt – less natural extrusion tendency — greater chance of controlled molar protraction and closing rotation.

5. Pearls for exams & case presentations

When presenting a case, include: vertical pattern, extent of AOB, growth indicators (hand–wrist/CS stage), extraction rationale, and how you’ll control vertical molar movement.

Don’t equate “extraction = guaranteed closing rotation.” The pattern of tooth movement (extrusion vs. translation) and growth stage are decisive. 

Spotify Episode Link: https://creators.spotify.com/pod/profile/dr-anisha-valli/episodes/Vertical-changes-following-orthodontic-extraction-treatment-in-skeletal-open-bite-subjects-e36qgc5

Leave a comment