ADENOMATOID ODONTOGENIC TUMOUR:

This image has an empty alt attribute; its file name is maxresdefault-2-2.jpg


• Adenomatoid odontogenic tumor (AOT), generally considered to be an uncommon tumor
• Occurs mostly in association with an unerupted maxillary cuspid.
• Some investigators consider it as a benign neoplasm, while others have categorized it as a hamartomatous malformation due to the limited size and to the lack of recurrence of most cases (attributed perhaps to its minimal growth potential).
• The AOT represents 3% to 7% of all odontogenic tumors.

• Although this lesion was formerly considered to be a variant of the ameloblastoma and was designated as “adenoma glioblastoma,” its clinical features and biologic behavior indicate that it is a separate entity.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY:
• There is evidence that the tumor cells are derived from enamel organ epithelium.
• Investigators have also suggested that the lesion arises from remnants of dental lamina.
• The specific stimulus that triggers proliferation of the progenitor cells of AOT is unknown.
• Various hypotheses for the pathogenesis of AOT have been proposed. It could theoretically arise from the:

  1. Enamel organ
  2. The Epithelial lining of dentigerous cyst.
  3. Epithelial rests of Malassez of the deciduous or permanent tooth
  4. Remnants of the dental lamina.

CLINICAL FEATURES:
• The mean age of these patients was approximately 18 years, with a range of 5-53 years.
• However, 73% of the patient were under 20 years of age.
• Marked predilection: in females 64%: males 36%.
• Occurrence: greater in the maxilla (65%) than in the mandible (35%).
• In contrast to the ameloblastoma, this tumor occurs more frequently in the anterior part of the jaws with 76% developing anterior to the cuspid in the maxilla and mandible.
• Only very rarely does the lesion occur distal to the premolar area.
• It is of some interest that in at least 74% of the cases, the tumors were associated with an unerupted tooth, and in over two-thirds of the cases, this tooth was the maxillary or mandibular cuspid.
• Most tumors are relatively small, seldom exceed 3 cm in greatest diameter.
• Although a few large lesions have been reported.
• Peripheral (extraosseous) forms of the tumor are also encountered but are rare.
• These usually appear as small, sessile masses on the facial gingiva of the maxilla.
• Clinically, these lesions cannot be differentiated from the common gingival fibrous lesions.

***It is known as two-third tumour:
As it is seen :
• 2/3rd in females.
• 2/3rd in Anterior teeth region.
• 2/3rd in impacted tooth region.
• 2/3rd in cuspid region.

RADIOGRAPHIC FEATURES:
• They are frequently asymptomatic , are discovered during the course of a routine radiographic examination or when films are made to determine why a tooth has not erupted.
Larger lesions cause a painless expansion of the bones.
• In about 75% of cases, the tumor appears as a circumscribed, unilocular radiolucency that involves the crown of an unerupted tooth, most often a canine.
Follicular type of AOT may be impossible to differentiate radiographically from the dentigerous cyst.
Radiolucency associated with the follicular type of AOT sometimes extends apically along the root past the cementoenamel junction.
• This feature may help to distinguish an AOT from a dentigerous cyst.
• Less often the AOT is a well-delineated unilocular radiolucency that is not related to an unerupted tooth, but rather is located between the roots of erupted teeth (extrafollicular type)
• The lesion may appear completely radiolucent: often, however, it contains fine (snowflake) calcifications.
• Rare, multilocular cases have been reported and a scalloped border is observed occasionally.
• Most cases are between 1 and 3 cm in greatest diameter. About 65% of reported cases also demonstrate faintly detectable radiopaque foci within the radiolucent lesion.
• Occasionally, a more obvious intralesional radiopacity may be identified, usually eccentrically positioned within the lesion.
Divergence of roots and displacement of teeth occurs more frequently than root resorption.
Orbital and maxillary sinus encroachment have been reported.
• Gingival lesions may cause slight erosion of the underlying alveolar bone cortex.

HISTOLOGICAL FEATURES:
• AOT is a well-defined lesion that is usually surrounded by thick capsule.
• When the lesion is bisected the central portion of the tumor may be essentially solid or may show varying degrees of cystic change.
• Microscopically , the tumour composes of spindle shaped epithelial cells that form sheets, strand, or whorled masses of cells in a scant fibrous stroma
• The epithelial cells may form rosette like structures about a central space, which may be empty or contain small amounts of eosinophilic material.
• This material may stain for amyloid.
• The tubular or duct like structures, which are the characteristic feature of the AOT, may be prominent, scanty, or even absent in a given lesion.
• Lesion may consist of a central space surrounded by a layer of columnar or cuboidal epithelial cells.
• The nuclei of these cells tend to be polarized away from the central space.
Small foci of calcification may also be scattered throughout the tumor.
• These have been interpreted as abortive enamel formation.
• Some tumours may contain larger areas of matrix material or calcification.
• This material has been interpreted as dentinoid or cementum.
• Some lesions also have another pattern, particularly at the periphery of the tumor adjacent to the capsule.
• This consists of narrow, often anastomosing cords of epithelium in an eosinophilic, loosely arranged matrix.


TREATMENT & PROGNOSIS:
• AOT is completely benign: because of its capsule, it enucleated easily from the bonc
• Aggressive behavior has not been documented.
• Recurrence after enucleation seldom, if ever, occurs.

REFERENCES:
• Shafer’s Textbook of Oral Pathology (6th Edition).
• Textbook of Oral Pathology, Neville (3rd Edition).
• Manual of Oral Histology & Oral Pathology, Maji Jose.

  • Hackdentistry/youtube.com

Leave a comment